The United States is an interesting place.
While we promote the acquisition of money, prestige, power and all things material we are also a forgiving bunch. We like the underdog and we are very willing to give people and organizations a second chance even when all logic wouldn’t merit it. It’s a very cool thing that Americans keep alive but the Internet may be helping that ideal to fade into the past.
In my last post, I discussed how our inability to forget because of the Internet could lead to less of an ability to forgive. Thus, it stands to follow that our culture of ‘second chances’ could be grinding to a halt as well.
The New York Times article I am drawing inspiration from, takes this idea to the next level and, while I can see the logic, I hate the direction we are headed.
The fact that the Internet never seems to forget is threatening, at an almost existential level, our ability to control our identities; to preserve the option of reinventing ourselves and starting anew; to overcome our checkered pasts.
Now, many would ask that if you have a ‘checkered past’ then why would you deserve a second chance? Well, the basic premise of second chances is that a person or organization has learned and, as a result, changed because of past wrongdoings. We don’t like to hand out second chances to people who are exhibiting a ‘checkered present’ that continues their ‘checkered past’. We may be forgiving but we’re not stupid.
But with the way everything is kept in the digital record these days the checkered past doesn’t get the chance to fade away like it used to and could actually keep people from showing just how much they have changed. The Times article explores this a little more.
In a recent book, “Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age,” the cyberscholar Viktor Mayer-Schönberger cites Stacy Snyder’s case as a reminder of the importance of “societal forgetting.” By “erasing external memories,” he says in the book, “our society accepts that human beings evolve over time, that we have the capacity to learn from past experiences and adjust our behavior.” In traditional societies, where missteps are observed but not necessarily recorded, the limits of human memory ensure that people’s sins are eventually forgotten. By contrast, Mayer-Schönberger notes, a society in which everything is recorded “will forever tether us to all our past actions, making it impossible, in practice, to escape them.” He concludes that “without some form of forgetting, forgiving becomes a difficult undertaking.”
OK, are you scared yet? The point here is that we need to be on top of our past just as much as out present. Why? Because we will need to exhibit that we have truly changed because that memory of our past misgivings will not be allowed to fade.
I agree this seems a little daunting but I think it could be a very good thing. For the good people who have made genuine mistakes in the past they will be able to exhibit their changed life. That is evidence of being worthy of a true ‘second chance’.
Those, however, who have relied on people’s short memories to give them a chance to “re-invent” themselves without actually changing (in other words, being the same wolf in a different sheep’s clothing) will be easier to spot and will be less likely to pull the same scam twice.
So this is scary isn’t it? I say only if you are still making the same mistakes and no one really wants to do that now, do they?
If you would like to learn more about how you can keep track of your online presence without breaking the bank, contact us today and we’ll be glad to assist you understand the ever changing world of online reputation and social media monitoring.